I have been thinking about what the schedule at my school will be when we return from Christmas break.
My school had gone hybrid a few weeks ago, after being 100% online, from the beginning of the school year. I didn't work until hybrid, and, as far as my actual work, besides boring to all get-out, it was pure joy - even felt a tad guilty (but I know the tide will turn at some point, and I'll earn every penny, again

).
Then Covid exploded, again, and my school, and most others in the area, went back to 100% online.
What is strange, to me, is that many other districts, in the area, are saying (in the news) that they are going back to all students in class, all 5 days, after the Christmas break (including my school).
How does that make any sense?
They went back to 100% online because of how bad covid was (a week before 2-week break, a week early) but in just 3 weeks they say they plan on opening up, fully, beyond what they were just a few weeks ago?
Obviously, the vaccine won't make a difference that quickly.
My school still says that it is planning on students going to full, in-person, after the break (said via the website). Secretary doesn't see it happening, either, but I hear the same thing on the news, from many districts.
Secretary doesn't even think we'll even go back to hybrid (confidentially), but I hope we do, since I want to see the students in class, at least some, and selfishly, because it can't be easier and I need the money.
What am I missing, here? Schools went from 100% online, then to hybrid. The virus exploded, the schools went back to 100% online, unplanned, a week early,
into the Christmas break. How then can the schools open, 3 weeks later (after break), with students 100% in person, all 5 days? Even better than BEFORE the break? Even better than hybrid?
When I first was told that we were going back to 100% online, I thought that it might be because they didn't want to waste any more money (in their view) on us (the subs), because I've had classes with just 1 student, and never more than 7. Usually 2 or 3.
I now think it was because of the spike in covid, after hearing that explanation in the news from other districts.
Secretary said it could be because many students are non-covid sick, so many not going to school, but I don't really know.
My school has had 3 teachers, and many students, in quarantine. Do you think it is just because they don't want to pay the subs? Am I making this too much about subs? Am I making this too much about me (I have a habit of doing that lol)?
I really hope it isn't because they don't want to pay subs to watch such a small number of students, because it also allows the students, those present at school, to see their teachers, in person, even if just a little. That is awesome.
I would also think that they could use some of their covid money to pay us subs, so it wouldn't come out of their regular budget.
What do you guys think? What have your schools/districts/confidants said, if anything? Have your schools/districts said, for sure, how they will open? Or are they still up in the air, waiting to see what will happen, like my school?
I hate that uneasy, unknown feeling that I have, right now, in not knowing what will happen, for sure. I would almost rather have bad news, that I know for sure, than having to wait it out in the unknown. Patience isn't my strong suit.
Worse, I'm sure, for the students, though.
Sorry for the length. Bless you if you read it through

.